Master plan could bring major road changes to Brookings

25-year outlook proposes ‘road diets,’ narrowing lanes to improve safety

in , , ,

BROOKINGS — The city’s leaders got a peek at potential improvements in the community’s transportation network over the next 25 years at the May 26 meeting of the Brookings City Council.

Formally known as the Brookings Area Transportation Plan, it focuses on all sorts of traffic — from motorists to bicyclists to pedestrians — and how the road network can be improved to efficiently and safely handle it as the city continues to grow. It’s several years in the making at a cost of $225,056.88, of which the city’s share is 20%, or $45,011.38.

The presentation, which also included information on the Brookings Area Safety Plan, held the attention of councilors for the better part of an hour. No action was taken, but it’s expected to come before the council again for possible acceptance as early as June 9.

Councilor Holly Tilton Byrne sought further insights regarding the impact the plans could have on Brookings and the surrounding area.

“When we vote on that, we’re not necessarily saying that everything that is in this plan will be implemented, correct?” she inquired.

“That is correct. It would be a process over many, many years and when grants are available as well,” City Manager Paul Briseno explained. “It would include discussions when we bring the capital improvement plan to you as far as the budgeting process. … It doesn’t mean that everything is going to be implemented, and not everything is going to be implemented immediately. There’s still a lot of public discussions that would have to take place for any one of these projects.”

Tilton Byrne cited past experiences in her follow-up to Briseno’s comment.

“I think for those of us on council, we’re pretty familiar with other master plans that we operate under knowing that not everything that’s in those plans gets implemented,” she noted. “Sometimes we amend those plans. As time goes on, they really become kind of living documents that help guide our decision-making process. I just wanted to make that really clear for the public.”

If accepted later in June, the BATP would look at several potential solutions to improve traffic flow in Brookings, including putting several routes on “road diets” — in other words, narrowing them and reallocating space for pedestrians and bicycles. These would include sections of:

• Main Avenue South: From Eighth Street South to 20th Street South, narrowing it from five lanes to three lanes.

• Summit Pass: From 16th Avenue South to Western Avenue South, narrowed to two lanes.

• 15th Street South: From Medary Avenue South to 17th Avenue South, narrowed to two lanes.

• Medary Avenue: From Eighth Street to Sixth Street, reducing it from four lanes to three lanes.

“A lot of times across the nation, cities are constantly adding more and more lanes because people assume it’s safer (and) better (to get to) places quicker,” Briseno said. “Can you help us understand how narrowing the road actually makes it safer?”

HDR representative Thomas Cook took up the baton.

“When we think about it from a multimodal standpoint: Pedestrians, you’re looking at reducing a lane, so reducing the crossing distance a pedestrian has to cross to the other side, and it limits their exposure to a vehicle collision. It also gets them across the street faster,” he explained.

Cook added that, in general, with five lanes vehicles tend to spread out more, so narrowing can consolidate traffic flow a bit more and slow it down at the same time. It can also assist with things such as controlling left-turn conflicts, especially on roadways like Medary where it’s “an undivided four-lane; there’s no left-turn lane.”

Potential downtown changes are also part of the mix to, again, enhance safety for all road users. Narrowing could be among those changes, along with bike lanes, but nothing is set in stone at the moment. The focus was on these route segments:

• Main Avenue: From Third Street to Sixth Street.

• Third Avenue: From Third Street to Sixth Street.

• Fifth Avenue: From Third Street to Sixth Street.

In closing the discussion, Mayor Oepke “Ope” Niemeyer raised the issue of the intersection of Sixth Street and Western Avenue, and the possibility of putting a roundabout there.

Cook indicated that the plan includes the potential for a traffic signal or a reconfigured roundabout at what he called “probably the most high-profile location.”

Niemeyer agreed. “That corner is a consistent complaint item,” the mayor said. “I get that comment to me at least once a week.”

— Contact Mondell Keck at [email protected].

Comments

4 responses to “Master plan could bring major road changes to Brookings”

  1. Bruce Willcock Avatar
    Bruce Willcock

    You want to REDUCE lanes?? If that happens, watch the mass exodus of this traffic-stifled city! No 5 lane east-west routes with ridiculous choke points already (Medary and 20th), entire length of 8th St So, and a waste of purpose driving on the rest of Medary Ave and also the route formerly considered Hwy 14 bypass. The real people of this community want to be able to get from home to work or vise-versa without the 15-20 minutes. Otherwise we might just as well live in Sioux Falls. Quit listening to the so-called experts (engineers/career consultants) and start listening to the citizens who endure the incredibly poor decisions regarding our city traffic and street layouts. And fix the blasted awful stop-light programming (I-29& 6th, 6th and 32nd)!

  2. Gary Knutson Avatar
    Gary Knutson

    I don’t see how narrowing these streets are going to make things more safer by any means. It would do the opposite if anything. You talk about the safety of pedestrians to make it more safe for them crossing the streets. When pedestrians cross the streets they are crossing it with traffic lights, it not like their crossing the streets with out a traffic light while vehicles are on the road. but narrowing the streets are going to make traffic more congested. People want to get to their destinations of places to where they want to go. If make a four lane into a two lane, you’re going to have that lane very lengthy. I guess I really don’t see this is a very good suggestion. And further more, why are we spending tax payers money on things that don’t need to be done. There’s a saying, if it’s not broken, don’t fix it.

  3. Troy Maroney Avatar
    Troy Maroney

    Five lanes to three lanes is brutal, especially if you get caught behind a non-Brookings resident who thinks the speed limit is 25 (thinking 8th Street South and 20th Street South all the way from Main out to 22nd Ave).
    As for round-a-bouts – in my experience they are one of the most dangerous intersections around (pun not intended) because people don’t know how to use them and I’m not sure if the “cost savings” versus an old-fashioned stop light – which it seems that Brookings doesn’t like to incorporate due to not enough traffic (which outweighs the safety situation) – is worth the terror-inducing sojourns through aforementioned roundabouts.
    One thing that should be considered, IMO, is extending 15th Street South all the way to 22nd Ave – it could help reduce congestion on 20th Street South and 12th Street South – but it might make too much sense to do that (and you’d upset one of your major property retailers).
    I wish the planners would drive through different problem areas that exist right now, which could include any of the schools during drop-off and pick-up times, and fix those situations before going out and creating more problem areas just because a national expert tells them this is what other towns/cities are doing – you don’t have to spend money just to spend money (although the 20th Street/22nd Ave. has been a goat rope from the get-go – although there were obstacles, that should have been done up like the Perkins intersection from the start).

    1. Julie Avatar

      I agree with Troy- fix the problem areas where all the congestion is from building schools so close together. Having 2 lane roads on main thoroughfares is backwards.
      Is it necessary to spend surplus money- just because it’s there???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *