It is almost impossible to be against a rule announced by the Environmental Protection Agency this month requiring utilities to replace all lead pipes within a decade.
After all, who opposes the swift removal of a deadly toxin from drinking water? But theres a tricky road ahead, and its an expensive one to travel.
The 9 million or so service lines across the United States pumping poison through our homes and into our bodies cause all manner of maladies, such as high blood pressure, kidney malfunction, cognitive disability and hyperactivity.
The EPA estimates that, in a country without lead pipes, 1,500 fewer people every year would die early of heart disease and about 900,000 fewer infants would suffer from low birth weight. The shift could even prevent 200,000 lost IQ points in children annually.
The nation has known for 40 years of these grave risks to public health.
Now, finally, the EPA is not only mandating that drinking water systems everywhere locate and eliminate lead pipes within 10 years. Its also lowering the acceptable level of contamination and tightening rules on testing including, crucially, in child-care facilities and schools.
Tearing up the infrastructure that has undergirded much of urban America for nearly a century is vital. But its also difficult work. The woes afflicting Flint, Michigan, were far from unique. Other cities, such as Chicago, Baltimore and Syracuse, New York, have seen similar problems. Some, after public-relations disasters, have taken pains to improve their situations: D.C., happens to be a fine example; so are Newark and Denver. Others, however, havent acted as swiftly and they might struggle to catch up.
Years of inaction shouldnt be an excuse for lateness now. But the reality is that the federal government will have to play a substantial role for the country to meet its timeline. Smaller municipalities in particular lack the know-how and workforce to do this job on their own.
Theyll require technical assistance, which, thankfully, the EPA already provides and must furnish as proactively as possible.
Even unlimited help with the nuts and bolts of pipe replacement cant solve the problem of cost. The EPA estimates that the tab for 100 percent lead pipe removal will come in somewhere between $28 billion and $47 billion. The federal government has chipped in substantially, with $15 billion in dedicated funding through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and just shy of $12 billion in drinking water revolving funds that states can use to replace lead service lines if they choose.
The Biden administration pledged an additional $2.6 billion when it announced the new rule. Lawmakers should keep in mind that ridding the country of lead pipes will be a financial win in the end: The EPA initially indicated the health benefits would offset the cost of the bill more than twice over, but researchers at Harvard Universitys public health school crunched the numbers and found that the benefit-cost ratio could be as high as 35 to 1.
Still, at the moment, the gap between what has been allocated and whats needed is wide, and much of the difference will fall to the utilities and probably, in the end, ratepayers. Thats particularly worrying, given that water systems dont have to pay for replacing the portion of lead lines that are on private property (though they do have to take more aggressive action to replace them).
The exception is understandable, considering the legal constraints on the EPA, but the neighborhoods struggling the most with contaminated water tend also to be the poorest. That means residents might be unable to afford to replace the pipes on their property.
The only good answer is for the water systems to do everything they can to replace low-income consumers lead pipes for free. But the government federal, state and local will probably need to chip in to persuade providers to perform gratis replacements. The District, for instance, has given D.C. Water funding to cover replacements on private property when the utility replaces the portion in nearby public space. This kind of collaboration is crucial: Utilities encounter enough trouble persuading residents to allow them to dig up their lawns even when its free.
This struggle stems, in large part, from a lack of trust. That shouldnt come as a surprise: Lead pipes have been harming Americans for about a century now installed sometimes by city mandate, then ignored and even dismissed as inconsequential while residents became sick and the science pointed plainly to their problems. Replacing the pipes is only part of the solution to lead poisoning: Many plumbing fixtures still contain contaminants; source water too often remains improperly treated. But its an essential step for governments at all levels to regain the faith of those theyre supposed to serve.
Leave a Reply